-
Website
http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/ -
Original page
http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/droga5/enter_the_competition_its_your_turn_to_be_bob_garfield_100462.asp -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Alan Wolk
49 comments · 2 points
-
Kissmyblackads
38 comments · 3 points
-
yargo
26 comments · 1 points
-
Steve Hall
25 comments · 7 points
-
AdScam
25 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Rob Schwartz Admits That Chiat is "all Lee" Clow - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
4 days ago · 62 comments
-
Mother London's Holiday Gesture Will Make You Smile - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
KFC Knows How to Put White Guys at Ease - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
2 days ago · 10 comments
-
Breaking: Doner's Been Sold, Kalter to Retire - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
1 week ago · 33 comments
-
Blind Item: Which Creative Can't Hold His/Her Booze, Fights at Work? - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
4 days ago · 15 comments
-
Rob Schwartz Admits That Chiat is "all Lee" Clow - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
"It's not poetry"
but all power to them for giving it a crack and getting a big network to pay for it.
The site shows up as a blank page in Google's text cache:
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:http://hon...
The site has no metas... literally no metas.
<meta id="HeadKeywords" name="keywords" content="" />
<meta id="HeadDescription" name="description" content="" />
I don't even know where to start with that... like there is no excuse for coding like this.
The site violates the first rule of Google Guidelines:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/an...
"Make a site with a clear hierarchy and text links. Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link."
and it gets worse from there:
"Use a text browser such as Lynx to examine your site, because most search engine spiders see your site much as Lynx would. If fancy features such as JavaScript, cookies, session IDs, frames, DHTML, or Flash keep you from seeing all of your site in a text browser, then search engine spiders may have trouble crawling your site."
In other words, Droga has not read or implemented Google's Guidelines, and will subsequently rank according to the effort they did in compliance. ... IE: Garbage in.. Garbage out.
I would be ashamed to have pushed this out from my company... Your post noted that Droga is a digital shop? Like people pay them?
And remote controleld Bentley? Who cares? Makes them look like they tried to get the real thing but couldn't - so they went with the next best thing. What grown male buys a crappy R/C car? Guys that are into that kind of thing buy the real deal - the ones that go 0-60 in 3 seconds and cost $300. Leave the novelties to the children.
Here's a better idea:
Instead of creating all that content, why not just create a well-designed youtube mashup that pulls in videos and let's third-party online retailers tag frames of video. So when I go to the site, watch a clip of two blondes discussing the Large Hadron Collider on The Hills, I can, in a few short clicks on the actual footage, purchase whatever handbag they're sporting.
I'm much more interesting in what people are actually wearing, than what people are trying to tell me to wear.
If I want porn I'll go to...well, lots of places.
Actually, if it was a front-end for ebay with seller generated video-porn, I might think it broke some ground.
Hey, would someone please do that?
My eyes defocus for a few minutes and when I come back, the intro still isn't over, but that's ok. I'm starting to get an idea of what's going on here... this literally is a home shopping website. See, it's the home shopping channel for the "digital generation". Yeah, they went there. There's an entire generation on this planet that is digital. And do you know what digital means? It means post-modern and ironic. What what? The digital generation doesn't want a hard sell--it wants satire. This is the home shopping channel that makes fun of your mom's home shopping channel--so it's YOUR home shopping channel! They're actually trying to sell a Volvo C30 (which I think my Mom actually owns) with clown cops in hot pants, a zombie child, and a super hero mafioso emcee. I watched it for 3 minutes before they made any mention of any features (dual exhaust... shouldn't there be some clever twist in the delivery though? Hel-lo... fart joke? Strangely no). Ok, moving on... from a 22k car to a $125 pimped out baseball cap. Who wants one of these hats? I can see people wearing them... but it seems like kind of a niche market of LA Dodgers fans that go clubbing and are highly patriotic.
Flick Picks isn't bad. It's like a movie review show where the hosts try to explain the movie to people that have never even remotely heard of the movie they're reviewing or the stars of the movie. It's a tough concept to pull off, but they do it kinda ok. The actors are a bit more likable here because there are fewer layers of nauseating self-consciousness here. But teenagers are nauseatingly self-conscious, and I assume that they're the digital generation. It takes me back to when MTV launched in the 80s, and they had all of these avant garde shorts playing all the time. That shit was cutting-edge artsy-fartsy. This is like MTV for the Target generation... but would an average 15 year old buy a $125 hat? Would they even WANT to buy a Volvo?
Here's the thing about this site: There's a lot of non-sequitar skits. Remember when MTV started transitioning from playing music to original programming? That was annoying because you didn't know what to expect. I think they went all-rap for a couple years in the 90s, too, which was a little disorienting. Well, that's what's going on here... it's annoying.
The site is best focused when dealing with girl stuff. The Girl Fashion section shows American Apparel-type models talking about clothes. That's like having the girls from TV's The Hills sit around talking about their feelings. In other words, that's what girls do and probably what they want to see. Like the opposite of The View, ie, attractive people who get along well. I'd be willing to guess that everything other than the Beauty and Fashion sections of Honeyshed gets the boot in short order.
This launch is a nice start. But the economy has taken a non-ironic nosedive and frivolity is not in the consumer lexicon at the moment. So cut the skits, the weird, dead-end attempts at humor, and just sell our teenage girls their clothes and beauty products. And thanks for taking me back to a surreal version of the 80s!
Tap Project: Paid for by Droga.
Honeyshed: Paid for by Droga. After languishing in abject failure for years.
The Million Program: Paid for by Droga.
They exist on scam ads. While Droga's BS is about ten million times better for the world than most scam ads, they're still BS self-productions.
It'll be nice to see what they do for an actual paying client. Hey agency spy: let's save the BJ's untill then, huh?
Thanks,
The Hard Working Creatives Who Actually Work Off Of Briefs For Paying Clients
I bet you did.
Tell you what. Next time your no-no hole gets greasy because someone from a Buzzy shop calls you up (direct! OMG, he's got your number!) just hang up and rub one out. I know I think better after rubbing one out.
Then remember you're ostensibly a sort-of journalist.
Then remember people get pissed off when you suck BuzzShop cock. Because it reminds us how PR makes careers in advertising. Instead of real talent.
Then call them out in a post instead of sucking them off with your eyes open.
You got it in you! I know it!
xo
I watched that shit for twenty minutes, and I had no fucking idea what was going on. I don't care what comes next in Honeyshed. That's a, uh, problem, I guess. It should be like flipping channels. You have to go there with the intent of being involved in it. Optimally, I'd want to be able to go to Honeyshed like I'd go to facebook or my blogger reading list: go there once an hour or so to see if anyone's posted anything new, if anything's been updated, look at it, leave, come back later. Honeyshed is actually *too* involved. It demands too much of me. I just want to be able to go, look at something interesting for a second, maybe something funny or something I'll wanna buy, make a quick decision and get the fuck out. That's not too much to ask. Also, and I swear this is the last thing -- the Flick Picks guys are the best people on the site because, between saying 'phenomenal' and 'awesome' and 'amazing,' they don't seem to be reading a script and hey, this is new, reacting to what each other is saying. Don't tell me a fucking jacket is as comfortable in the club as it is in the gym. I will stab you in the eye. Be human beings with honest opinions. Well, anyway.
you sad jealous little idiot.
Big big fan of d5 and have friends that work there.
is your life that sad you have to shit on those doing good?
and where do you get off, just making up shit?
Tap is the only Pro bono they have done. and thank good they did it.
and honeyShed you moron is a separate company funded by Publicis.
i didn't explore too deep. i didn't buy anything either. but my one thought. if they really want to build this (i know they must be interested in my input, heck, it might already be something they do), for a couple of hours a week they should do this live.
the live on camera connection, build a sort of realtime connection feel with people, and the tune-in wouldn't feel quite so dislocated.
the event would add a bit of something.
also, get some sordid stories of back stage romance and rivalries into trashy magazines.
i realize i've missed out on other obvious influences. teletubbies/in the night garden. sesame street. power rangers & HeadOn.
It seems like something that would be really interesting to work on. But just for a week. Honeyshed might take on a life of its own & turn 10 someday, but I don't quite see it. Good luck.
Yes Droga could get better scripts and Smuggler produce better clips but I dont think that's the point. in fact, I think they are almost irrelevant. the future or genius of Honeyshed is the one channel of UGC. real people with real stores. if they drop the other stuff and focus on that i think they have a winner. If not, they will kill themselves trying to stay hip and fail big time.
Check it: http://tinyurl.com/honeyshed
Greg
Can't wait to see who wins,
HoneyShed
Don't even get me started on the misogyny. You'd have to stick your feet in those models' twats and wear them as slippers to make it any more degrading.
Honeyshed tried to cater to the digital generation, but ended up pandering instead. T-shirts that come with a free condom? Bad actresses poorly scripted to sound stupid? “You know you want it?” I’m not sure I could find anyone at any age that wouldn’t find this a bit…tired.
This generation craves authenticity. So scripted lines like “at Honeyshed we’re dedicated to bringing you the greatest products” reads more like the misguided mission statement from a lame 9 to 5 than a place they’d like to spend time shopping.
Oh, they don’t enjoy a brand talking AT them, either. Will.I.Am selling a keyboard is a good departure from this. He’s an expert. He’s real. He has independent thoughts. He’s also not the voice of the brand, piped through an ambiguous actor. Like, whatever.
There’s a good idea here. And a tweak or two could right the ship, so to speak. The sharing features are awesome. Bring them to the forefront. Strip out the “talent.” Use the users themselves to sell the products—all of them. The digital generation has shown no shyness for the spotlight. So, set the stage, and step out of the way.
The commenter who mentioned tagging YouTube clips with product links is on to something genius, too. Honeyshed could serve as the link between entertainment and attainment of the products that happen to appear throughout. Countless people search for the clothes they see on TV. The mere existence of the E! Network and their Oscar coverage is proof.
So. Kudos to Droga for playing in the right sandbox. It’s a step in the right direction. Let the digital generation use it more, and watch it less, and you may just “kill it” as the kids say. (Right?)
re: honeyshed - the piles of advance hype proclaiming it as the thing that will reinvent advertising did it no favors. as for how much the architects are complicit in that, open for debate. but there probably is a solid, sustainable idea in there. problem is that like most media that tries to connect with that demographic (which doesn't come directly from that demographic), it's too smug by half.
Truth is, the sites a piece of overpriced garbage that is completely out of touch with what people are looking for in their internut experience. It fails on every angle, porn not as pornorific as the million of other sites, humor that's not even funny, and shopping that's confusing and laborious. Nice job shed! The trifekta of fail!
I wish fuckheads like this would give me 1/20th of the budget to tell them that production for the internet was a proven failure 10 years ago. Even their failure is out of touch with the times..
Sad, sad stuff. And no, I'm actually in my house I own, paid for by ad agency money because I actually know what I'm doing. So if anyone who is funding the 'shed wants to give me a call, I'll explain in real terms why this is a colossal waste of funds.