-
Website
http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/ -
Original page
http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/news/rga_had_pepsi_na_digital_locked_up_until_106853.asp -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Alan Wolk
49 comments · 2 points
-
Kissmyblackads
38 comments · 3 points
-
yargo
26 comments · 1 points
-
Steve Hall
25 comments · 7 points
-
AdScam
25 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Rob Schwartz Admits That Chiat is "all Lee" Clow - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
4 days ago · 62 comments
-
Mother London's Holiday Gesture Will Make You Smile - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
3 days ago · 16 comments
-
KFC Knows How to Put White Guys at Ease - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
2 days ago · 10 comments
-
Breaking: Doner's Been Sold, Kalter to Retire - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
1 week ago · 33 comments
-
Blind Item: Which Creative Can't Hold His/Her Booze, Fights at Work? - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
4 days ago · 15 comments
-
Rob Schwartz Admits That Chiat is "all Lee" Clow - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy
Digital agencies can hire trad experience and trad agencies can hire digital experience. It's a two way street. I don't believe the future belongs to places like R/GA any more than it belongs to places like JWT. Just like the trads have a long way to go before they can be integrated shops, the digis have a long way to go before they can own a brand.
I'm not saying that the Chiat work isn't a piece of shite, because it is. And I'm not saying that trad and digi shouldn't get along. But when you write things like, "...cuz being steeped in digital probably means you know what you're doing," you're just buying into the same pixie dust everyone else is snorting. R/GA is a great design agency and a terrible advertising agency. End of story.
What I didn't do was say, "they're steeped in design, flawless execution, etc etc." because it wouldn't be true. You'd say O&M was steeped in print, because that's what made them the agency they came to be.
I'll be critical of them when it's appropriate.
Traditional people think
1.its all about the idea
2.execution can always be farmed out/done cheaply
3.I dont need a online portfolio-- i have a "book" or connections
4. We can handle print tv
5.All i need to know is photoshop
6.I spent 2 years at a ad school
Digital people think
1. its about he idea and the execution
2. good execution can be done by a small # of shops
3. I need a online portfolio, what the hell is a book?
4. We can do it all
5. I need to know photoshop, illustrator, after effects and flash
6.I spent 4 years at a new media design school
All thats stoping the digital agencies from taking over is clients, clients are too stupid to realize that were living in a digital age, and are still abiding by the the old rules of a traditional past. But in this case r/ga and tbwa did some bad creative work/ the tv and online campaigns really said nothing at all. throwing video content on a page is not cool, or impressive. Traditional folks will always be at war with digital folks. Its sad but ive seen very few campaigns go smoothly without beefing from the traditional and digital agencies involved, egos, prizes, awards, credit is all on the line so theres always gonna be war.
Also, what digital has Chiat ever produced? They have no business in this space, especially since it seems most of their top creative leaders despise and resent the internet...oh yeah, that's where the money is going.
Traditional agencies can't ramp up to do digital? Um...tell that to Goodby - which had ALL print and TV creatives 2 years ago. Now they win more awards and do more great digital than just about anyone.
Interactive allows you to be smarter, better marketers (it's beyond advertising, because the best digital minds, I feel, go beyond "awareness.") It's about relevance, usefulness and credibility. Hopefully, clients will become more aware of this and make changes accordingly. Agencies will hopefully change the pay structure of creatives to emphasize less on rigged, fake-ads winning awards and more on actual results and meaningful interactions with clients' customers and potential customers.
aren't those huge ideas? You can ask that same question of any agency . The real truth is, this whole industry is suffering from crap work and a lot of guys from the traditional side (Like myself) have migrated over to smaller boutiques like Anomoly and Droga and R/GA because they can be nimble and approach these problems with different filters. Kyle is probably one of those guys that likes to hear himself talk and probably works at a place like Chiat, but barely made it through ad school and works on Pizza Hut. Well, that is unless he's been fired from this last round of lay offs.
This industry is full of hacks and has been for a while, but that's not new its just a little more obvious. The traditional model is and has always been, sell through an idea and then rely on all of the best directors, outside shops and production houses to make it look better than the agency ever could and that is still how a lot of the bigger places do it, thats how Goodby has won most of it's "digital" awards, they just haven't figured out how to get paid for that stuff. It's just a different time and the production companies have figured that out and are getting a lot better at telling stories, so I don't think anyone should be sitting smug. The old days are gone, clients know a lot more than they should and the younger they get, the more big ideas you'll see coming out of the smaller, cheaper shops. That's just the way it goes. and while we are on the subject of chiat and ideas . . . you are saying that those billboards that look a lot like the att campaign from 2 years ago http://www.adrants.com/images/att_blogging_deli...
and say crap like Yo and Fo Sho is a big idea that has been executed well?
Yeah, I can't wait to see them put that online, because people really care about that kind of thing.
The funnier thing is how this article has gotten everybody's panties in a bunch. My money says that Clow, Silverstein, Bogusky and Greenberg probably won't even read this.
Chiat didn't win the business as they never pitched. It was handed to them by the Pepsi CEO. I'm guessing the subsequent release of R/GA 2 min after they won it was also done by . . . the Pepsi CEO. Not because the big pink billboards with relevant youth words like YO and HOWDY did the trick in making Pepsi cool again.
Heres what people value in this industry in this order
1.money
2.power
3.clients
4.ego
5.connections
6.skills
7.friends
8.diversity
Traditional and digital agencies never play nice.
Most of the time by the time the digital agency gets
a crack at the creative, its gonna suck. 1.First clients go to the traditonal to come up with the idea. 2. That agency will then they go to the digital agency for the site 3. then the digital agency goes to the production company t4.hen the production company hires a freelancer /freelancerswho could care less about the final outcome. thats why campaigns will always suck, its a nasty food chain, no one wants to do the work, but everybody wants a award and full credit when it goes big. chiat doesnt even play nice with tequilla what makes u think they will play nice with r/ga. Its about politics, all the way. People are mean, for whatever reason.
if that's the case, why are your agencies dying and shrinking while the digis are growing? where's your money? oh, that's right... it's in the coffers of the digital agencies with the ridiculous names.
good luck with that attitude of yours when you get laid off.
I wonder when they will realize their 1 billion dollar mistake?