<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AgencySpy - Latest Comments in Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://agencyspy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://agencyspy.disqus.com/submitted_for_your_approval_saatchi_amp_saatchi_mediabistrocom_agencyspy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:06:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4483568</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great Web film.  The digital holiday campaign was sold to a usually boring/big client.  The ad agency is helping JC Penney to start thinking forward.  Which is fabulous for our industry and creatives who want to start selling good work to harder, safer brands.  The film was beautifully executed.  Tons of Buzz around it.  Lots of jealously.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It'll win awards. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Camp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:06:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4478237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure why this is so great.  Bashing men everywhere is so 90's.  It's long, and the dialog is horrendous.  I guess my big gripe here is that if you're going to use such an overused idea, at least make sure the execution is tight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AgencyBS</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:10:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4475608</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Saatchi,&lt;br&gt;I really enjoyed this film. Congrats for getting JCPenney to buy a viral campaign. Congrats for getting JCPenney to buy something so conceptual. Congrats on a brilliant  integration into a cheeky web site, to boot. What else can I say? I'm jealous. Looks like Graf has assembled another powerhouse team. Looking forward to seeing what's next.&lt;br&gt;Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:37:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4474699</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a Web film.  And, it is telling a story.  Therefore, it's not too long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's entertaining to watch and funny.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AND - it is getting results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Great campaign, guys. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Content Expo Conf. </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4471721</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wrong. i have a stack of lions and pencils on my trophy shelf. and not from the '90s when it was easy. this thing is bad, that's all. it's a better idea than the execution. and that's always a shame. the original post is obvious trolling for comments on matt's part, so maybe bad on us to fall for it and pile on.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;aside from that, the group of all-stars that created this boring film is capable of better. and when they phone it in and float self-indulgent, bad execution like this out there, they make our industry look out of touch and full of hubris. we all miss once in a while. i certainly have my reel of shame. but it's a fan's right to boo their heroes when they don't put forth an honest effort and shit the bed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newt rawknee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:30:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4469915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice idea but I've never seen anything more masturbatory.  Sooo belabored. &lt;br&gt;Someone wants to direct a feature. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peggy Olson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:47:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4469377</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, takes a loooooong time until the payoff, and some consumers might miss it at the end, but pretty darn good overall.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">UTBRT</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 18:16:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4467044</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this blows (which is doesn't), then where is all the great work out there that's so much better?  Is it coming from the people posting here?  I would guess not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a really cool piece that's gotten lots of attention, and deservedly so. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne Newton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:33:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4466890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jack - This campaign doesn't say women are superficial! This campaign says women get frustrated when men don't listen to them... which yes, could be considered a generalization, but it happens to ring very true.  The campaign continues to say that if men listen to women, they will realize that all they want is a gift from JC Penney for the holiday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Note:  Exchanging gifts for the holidays doesn't make you superficial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Get off your soapbox.  It’s a good campaign.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elise</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:25:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4466378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You know what... I'm seeing this campaign everywhere and it's working.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Job well done.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Love it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lauren</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4463856</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hate it.  Everything I hate about advertising and commercialism in America.  &lt;br&gt;Men are dumb.&lt;br&gt;Women are superficial.&lt;br&gt;Solve your problems with diamonds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The spoof DaBeers ad "She'd pretty much have to" is much wittier and accurate.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jack Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4462914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nah, just a guy trying to see what the general public will react to since that is the true audience. When people outside of our business pass it along, that means something is working ,no? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damonwebster</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:29:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4462737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hmmmmmm...what are you the junior account exec on the jc pennys trying to make light of the video?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jason</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:22:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4462578</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Out of all of the holiday ads this season, Saatchi's campaign for JC Penny is my fav.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My vote is like it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JJM</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:16:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4459774</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's such a silly thing for you to say. That's not even criticism, you just sound nasty and angry at the world. One can only assume you were rejected by both Graf and Buckley at some point.  Or that you have never done anything good in you whole career.  5 million people disagree with you online.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greehall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 11:23:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4458724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Loved it. It was well acted, timed and written. Sure it could have been shorter, but lets not be picky&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rico Figliolini</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:25:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4447667</link><description>&lt;p&gt;love. great performances. How can someone say it needed crazier scenarios?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Slick</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:47:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4442392</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A bit long but love it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JC</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4442092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp; that was the media department hitting return over and over. That's good. At least it gives them something to do...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bringoutyourdead</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4441958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;actually 200,000 hits in 3 weeks.     youtube&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">watson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:28:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4441617</link><description>&lt;p&gt;if that ran 5 minutes long, should have cut off 4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;death to masturbatory longform "films"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saatchi new zealand</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:08:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4441569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;as a lady-type, i think this idea rings true. i watched the whole thing and didn't have the urge to close the window once.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">betts</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:04:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4440719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"damonwebster": you "heard" 3 million views? from who? your director of digital media? is that astroturfing i smell?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">newt rawknee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:12:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4439597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;love love love&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">glossy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:14:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Submitted For Your Approval: Saatchi &amp;amp; Saatchi - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.adweek.com/agencyspy/submitted-for-your-approval-saatchi-saatchi/3453#comment-4439539</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love iT! Passed it on , and had it passed on to me by a ton of people NOT in the business.&lt;br&gt; That's working. And I heard 3 million views in 2 days. hmmmmm...maybe , just maybe it hit some chord.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">damonwebster</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:11:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>