<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AgencySpy - Latest Comments in There's a Twitter Feed for That: Ft. Hood Shootings - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://agencyspy.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://agencyspy.disqus.com/theres_a_twitter_feed_for_that_ft_hood_shootings_mediabistrocom_agencyspy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:53:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: There's a Twitter Feed for That: Ft. Hood Shootings - mediabistro.com: AgencySpy</title><link>http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/i_have_twatted/theres_a_twitter_feed_for_that_ft_hood_shootings_142375.asp#comment-22054311</link><description>&lt;p&gt;call me old (ok I'm old) . . . but munching digital 'pop corn' on a mass execution doesn't prevent it from happening, doesn't create any 'situational awareness' . . . it's symptomatic of a 'bearing witness' culture where we just point to something and sensationalize it. Guess it's good for the revenue side of things for the Austin Statesman --  eyeballs on the site metrics. Behaviorally, it begs the question of what a person do in an emergency where someone needs help, someone they don't know or frankly 'care' about -- call 911, try to assist or tweet it? It's a hypothetical jump ball&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M_Crothers</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>